Page 1 of 2

5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Sat 21 Mar 2020, 23:00
by baphomet
Okay ik trap maar gewoon af... Is 5G gevaarlijk? Sommigen beweren van wel, anderen van niet. Dat alleen al moet genoeg zijn voor de doorgewinterde QFFert om er eens voor te gaan zitten...


We moeten toch een fatsoenlijk 5G draadje met zijn allen aan kunnen leggen? Voorstanders en tegenstanders... Ook onwetenden mogen zich hieronder in de discussie mengen...

Nonetheless even wat meer over 5G... Het was een maat van me (The K.-Master van SXM) die me er op wees. Uiteraard had ik er wel eens wat over gehoord of gelezen, maar nooit eerder had ik er serieus naar gekeken.

Vanavond en eerder deze week dus wel even en dat heeft me aan het denken gezet...

Hoe reel is de angst voor 5G?

De een zegt letterlijk dat je er keihard aan dood gaat en de ander zegt dat het niet veel anders is dan WiFi...

Maar wat is het nou echt?

Nou daarover kunnen we hieronder wat mij betreft verder gaan...

Maar voor we dat gaan doen eerst even wat meer over 5G van her en der...
How Worried Should You Be About the Health Risks of 5G?

5G, the next generation of cellular technology for the next generation of smartphones, is imminent. And with it, there’s concern about the health risk of this new, more powerful network. How worried should you be about the coming 5G healthpocalypse?

By now, you may have seen articles on Facebook or alternative health websites. The gist: 5G is a dangerous escalation of traditional cellular technology, one packed with higher energy radiation that delivers potential damaging effects on human beings. Some 5G pundits contend that the new network generates radiofrequency radiation that can damage DNA and lead to cancer; cause oxidative damage that can cause premature aging; disrupt cell metabolism; and potentially lead to other diseases through the generation of stress proteins. Some articles cite research studies and opinions by reputable organizations like the World Health Organization.

It sounds worrisome, but let’s take a look at the actual science.

What Is 5G?
5G has been hyped for a few years, but this is the year that carriers begin the process of rolling out the new wireless standard. AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint have all started to deploy their networks in the first half of the year, though widespread availability is still a year or more away. 5G will get a foothold in little more than a handful of cities this year.

Update: With the onset of the Coronavirus pandemic, a number of viral social media conspiracy theories have speculated that 5G is the cause of the world’s current problems. Simply put, these claims are factually false. 5G does not cause Coronavirus.

RELATED: No, 5G Does Not Cause Coronavirus

That isn’t keeping device manufacturers and service providers from jumping onto the 5G bandwagon. Samsung’s new Galaxy S10 and Galaxy Fold (the phone that unfurls into a tablet), for example, are both 5G-ready, along with models from LG, Huawei, Motorola, ZTE, and more.

5G offers at least a tenfold improvement in network performance. The last major network upgrade was 4G, which debuted in 2009 (the year of the Colorado balloon boy hoax), with a peak speed of about 10 Mbps. In comparison, 5G is poised to deliver peak speeds between 10 and 20 Gbps. And network latency will drop from 30ms to about 1ms, ideal for video game streaming, online video, and the Internet of Things, which is anticipating 5G to connect sensors, computers, and other devices with ultra-low latency.

RELATED: What Is 5G, and How Fast Will It Be?

An Evolution of Concerns
Before we address 5G, it’s worth pointing out that the latest health fears about radiation aren’t happening in a vacuum (there’s some physics joke in there, no doubt). Concerns about 5G are the latest iteration of decades of headlines about the dangers of electromagnetic radiation. We’ve seen controversies about everything from the health risks of Wi-Fi to smart meters.

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, for example, is a hypothetical disease in which certain people experience debilitating symptoms in the presence of radiation like cell phones and Wi-Fi—so yes, Michael McKean’s bizarre behavior on “Better Call Saul” is a real thing. But despite people claiming such sensitivities for at least 30 years, systematic scientific reviews have found that “blinded” victims can’t tell when they’re in the presence of an electromagnetic field, and the World Health Organization now recommends psychological evaluation for people so afflicted.

Likewise, decades of studies have found no link between cell phones and cancers like brain tumors, though that hasn’t kept municipalities like San Francisco from passing laws requiring stores to display the radiation emitted by handsets—which implies, in the minds of consumers, risk.

How Dangerous Is Radiofrequency Radiation?

At the root of all concerns about cell phone networks is radiofrequency radiation (RFR). RFR is anything emitted in the electromagnetic spectrum, from microwaves to x-rays to radio waves to light from your monitor or light from the sun. Clearly, RFR isn’t inherently dangerous, so the problem becomes discovering under what circumstances it might be.

Scientists say that the most important criterion about whether any particular RFR is dangerous is whether it falls into the category of ionizing or non-ionizing radiation. Simply put, any radiation that’s non-ionizing is too weak to break chemical bonds. That includes ultraviolet, visible light, infrared, and everything with a lower frequency, like radio waves. Everyday technologies like power lines, FM radio, and Wi-Fi also fall into this range. (Microwaves are the lone exception: non-ionizing but able to damage tissue, they’re precisely and intentionally tuned to resonate with water molecules.) Frequencies above UV, like x-rays and gamma rays, are ionizing.

Dr. Steve Novella, an assistant professor of neurology at Yale and the editor of Science-Based Medicine, understands that people generally get concerned about radiation. “Using the term radiation is misleading because people think of nuclear weapons—they think of ionizing radiation that absolutely can cause damage. It can kill cells. It can cause DNA mutations.” But since non-ionizing radiation doesn’t cause DNA damage or tissue damage, Novella says that most concern about cell phone RFR is misplaced. “There’s no known mechanism for most forms of non-ionizing radiation to even have a biological effect,” he says.

Or, in the less refined but more visceral words of author C. Stuart Hardwick, “radiation isn’t magic death cooties.”

Studies Aren’t Clearcut
Of course, just because there’s no known mechanism for non-ionizing radiation to have a biological effect, that doesn’t’ mean it’s safe or that no effect exists. Indeed, researchers continue to conduct studies. One recent study was released by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), an agency run by the Department of Health and Human Services. In this widely quoted study about cell phone radio frequency radiation, scientists found that high exposure to 3G RFR led to some cases of cancerous heart tumors, brain tumors, and tumors in the adrenal glands of male rats.

The study is a good object lesson in how hard it is to do science like this. As RealClearScience points out, the number of tumors detected were so small that they statistically could have occurred by chance (which may be more likely since they were only detected in male subjects). Moreover, the level and duration of the RFR exposure were well in excess of what any actual human would ever be exposed to, and in fact, the irradiated test rats lived longer than the unexposed control rats. Says Dr. Novella, “Experienced researchers look at a study like that and say that doesn’t really tell us anything.”

Sizing Up 5G’s Risks
Ongoing studies aside, 5G is coming, and as mentioned, there are concerns about this new technology.

A common complaint about 5G is that, due to the lower power of 5G transmitters, there will be more of them. The Environmental Health Trust contends that “5G will require the buildout of literally hundreds of thousands of new wireless antennas in neighborhoods, cities, and towns. A cellular small cell or another transmitter will be placed every two to ten homes according to estimates.”

Says Dr. Novella, “What they’re really saying is the dose is going to be higher. Theoretically, this is a reasonable question to ask.” But skeptics caution you shouldn’t conflate asking the question with merely asserting that there’s a risk. As Novella points out, “We’re still talking about power and frequency less than light. You go out in the sun, and you’re bathed in electromagnetic radiation that’s far greater than these 5G cell towers.”

It’s easy to find claims online that the greater frequency of 5G alone constitutes a risk. observes that “1G, 2G, 3G and 4G use between 1 to 5 gigahertz frequency. 5G uses between 24 to 90 gigahertz frequency,” and then asserts that “Within the RF Radiation portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, the higher the frequency, the more dangerous it is to living organisms.”

But asserting that the higher frequency is more dangerous is just that—an assertion, and there’s little real science to stand behind it. 5G remains non-ionizing in nature.

The FCC—responsible for licensing the spectrum for public use—weighs in as well. Says Neil Derek Grace, a communications officer at the FCC, “For 5G equipment, the signals from commercial wireless transmitters are typically far below the RF exposure limits at any location that is accessible to the public.” The FCC defers to the FDA for actual health risk assessments, which takes a direct, but low-key approach to addressing the risks: “The weight of scientific evidence has not linked cell phones with any health problems.”

In 2011, the World Health Organization weighed in, classifying RF Radiation as a Group 2B agent, which is defined as “Possibly carcinogenic to humans.” This, too, is nuanced. Says Novella, “you have to look at all the other things they classify as a possible carcinogen. They put it in the same class as things like caffeine. That is such a weak standard that it basically means nothing. It’s like saying ‘everything causes cancer.’”

Part of the problem with the WHO declaration is that it’s focused on hazard, not risk—a subtle distinction often lost on non-scientists, not unlike the rigorous distinction between “precision” and “accuracy.” (Precision refers to how tightly clustered your data is; accuracy refers to how close that data is to the real value. You might have a dozen miscalibrated thermometers that all tell you the wrong temperature with a very high degree of precision.) When the WHO classifies coffee or nickel or pickles as a possible carcinogen, it’s asserting hazard without regard for real-world risk. Explains Novella, “A loaded pistol is a hazard because theoretically, it can cause damage. But if you lock it in a safe, the risk is negligible.”

Scientists will continue to test new networks as technology evolves, to make sure the technology we use every day remains safe. As recently as February, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal critiqued the FCC and FDA for insufficient research into the potential risks of 5G. As the NTP study shows, research into radiation risks is difficult and often inconclusive, meaning it can take a long time to make real progress.

But for now, everything we know about 5G networks tells us that there’s no reason to be alarmed. After all, there are many technologies we use every day with a substantially higher measurable risk. And as Dr. Novella says, “With 5G the hazard is low—but non-zero—and the actual risk appears to be zero. We’ve picked up no signal in the real world.”
Bron: -> ... sks-of-5g/

Maar hier weer heel wat anders:

Do you Know the Corona virus is not a fuckin virus it’s 5G that’s actually killing people and not a “virus”... they are trying to get u scared of a fake ass virus when it the 5G towers being built around the world. China was the first to have over 100,000 5G towers, and people in Wuhan were the first to get affected by it. This 5G shit was planned years ago to depopulate us and keep as at a low vibrational state. Bill gates is the one who created this along with the weird entities who control this world. He also is creating a vaccine for this so called corona virus that they are going to try to enforce on everyone. These Vaccines are actually chips that they are trying to implant in billions of people across the world. They can literally monitor all ya actions, movements, whereabouts, and thoughts through these lil micro chips. Not only that they can end ya life through them micro chips with the push of a button. They know in order to have millions of people take these vaccines they first need to create a fake virus. Smh it grinds my fuckin gears that you humans are brainwashed enough to believe wtf the news and media puts out there. WAKE TF UP and start researching the truths behind these weird agendas they keep creating. Y’all really out there with masks and shit on WHEN IT AINT NO DAMN VIRUSSSSSS. These Chinese doctors and people you see on TV that’s so called affected by the virus ARE ALL ACTORS, this shit is scripted out LITERALLY. It’s 5G towers that’s killing people and no mask in the world can prevent them levels of radiation from frying your brain. If we don’t wake tf up NOW this shit really kill us smh but of course y’all gonna think I’m crazy for saying this too right ??? Smh Fuckin Robots is what y’all are, legit programmed robots ‼️

@xofficial_benjix - insta
En dit bovenstaande bericht wordt door Facebook uiteraard als Fake News gemarkeerd. ;-)

Daar wordt dus een lik gelegd met de vele doden en het Coronavirus in Wuhan nadat er daar net een 5G netwerk actief was geworden. Ook in Italië zou men 5G hebben net als in Spanje...

Maar is het echt wel zo gevaarlijk?

Of is het gewoon pure ellende en dodelijke evil shizzle die een deel van de wereldbevolking uit gaat roeien?

Hieronder nog even wat videobeelden lol:

Nou wie zal het zeggen over 5G...

Roept U maar...

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Sat 21 Mar 2020, 23:42
by baphomet
Lees en huiver de post van Toxo in een ander topic:


Zou het fucking serieus zo zijn dat er een link tussen 5G en Corona is?

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 02:22
by blackbox
We are Electric Beings.....

Dr. Thomas Cowan, M.D. hypothesizes that Coronavirus may be history repeating itself and caused by 5G. Shot at the Health And Human Rights Summit in Tucson, Arizona on March 12, 2020. Camera, sound and editing by Joshua Coleman.

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:08
by baphomet

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:09
by baphomet

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:13
by baphomet
EU 5G Appèl – Wetenschappers waarschuwen voor mogelijke ernstige gezondheidseffecten van 5G

In een oproep aan de Europese Unie waarschuwen meer dan 180 wetenschappers en artsen uit 36 landen voor het gevaar van 5G, dat zal leiden tot een enorme toename van onvrijwillige blootstelling aan elektromagnetische straling. De wetenschappers dringen er bij de EU op aan Resolutie 1815 van de Raad van Europa te respecteren. Zij verzoeken om een onafhankelijke EU werkgroep in te stellen die de gezondheidseffecten opnieuw kan beoordelen.

“Wij, ondergetekende wetenschappers, adviseren een moratorium op de uitrol van 5G, de vijfde generatie voor mobiele communicatie, totdat potentiële gevaren voor de menselijke gezondheid en het milieu volledig zijn onderzocht door wetenschappers onafhankelijk van de industrie. 5G zal de blootstelling aan radiofrequente elektromagnetische velden (RF-EMF) aanzienlijk verhogen bovenop de reeds bestaande 2G, 3G, 4G, WiFi enz. RF-EMF is bewezen schadelijk voor mens en milieu”.

Eén van de initiatiefnemers is Dr.L. Hardell, Professor in Oncologie aan de Örebro Universiteit in Zweden. Hij stelt: “De telecomindustrie probeert technologie uit te rollen die mogelijk zeer reële, onbedoeld schadelijke consequenties heeft. Wetenschappelijke studies, zowel recent als van vele jaren geleden, stellen schadelijke effecten op de gezondheid vast bij testen van draadloze producten onder realistische omstandigheden. We zijn zeer bezorgd dat de toename van blootstelling aan straling door 5G, leidt tot schade die niet kan worden teruggedraaid”.

Hardell: “De vijfde generatie (5G) van radiofrequente straling wordt nu ontwikkeld. Dit wordt gedaan zonder dosimetrische bepaling of studie van de mogelijke gezondheidseffecten. De media verheerlijken vooral alle mogelijkheden die deze technologie belooft te zullen bieden, zoals de zelfrijdende auto en Internet of Things (IoT). De consequenties voor de gezondheid van mens, plant en dier worden in het geheel niet besproken. Politici, overheden en media zijn verantwoordelijk voor een onevenwichtige voorlichting. De gewone man wordt niet geïnformeerd over tegengestelde meningen over deze technologische ontwikkeling. Gezondheidseffecten door radiofrequente straling zijn in de media een non issue, althans in Zweden, maar ook in de meeste andere landen.”

PDF paper van Martin L. Pall, PhD, één van de initiatiefnemers: 5G: Great risk for EU, US and international health – Compelling evidence for eight distinct types of great harm caused by EMF exposures and the mechanism that causes them

EU Reflex studie toont DNA-schade aan door straling van draadloze apparaten en mobiele telefoons

5G Netwerk
De uitbreiding van het 5G-netwerk, bedoeld om grotere hoeveelheden data sneller draadloos te kunnen doorsturen, vereist de bouw van veel meer masten in stedelijke gebieden. Op die manier, redeneren de wetenschappers, ontsnapt niemand nog aan de potentieel schadelijke gevolgen van straling. We worden immers al blootgesteld aan 2G-, 3G, 4G- en Wi-Fi-straling.

Invloed van industrie op studies
Aangetoond is dat studies over de gezondheidsimpact van straling in het verleden vaak beïnvloed werden door de industrie. De wetenschappers dringen erop aan dat er nu onafhankelijk onderzoek gedaan wordt naar de gevolgen van 5G-straling “om de veiligheid van de bevolking te garanderen”. Daarom vragen ze aan de Europese Commissie om de uitbreiding van het 5G-netwerk uit te stellen “tot de potentiële risico’s voor de menselijke gezondheid en het milieu grondig onderzocht zijn door wetenschappers die onafhankelijk zijn van de industrie”.

Problemen met ICNIRP-blootstellingslimieten elektromagnetische straling

“Concluderend toont dit artikel aan dat de EU een 13-koppige, niet-gouvernementele particuliere organisatie, de ICNIRP, het mandaat heeft gegeven om een besluit te nemen over de RF-stralingsrichtlijnen. De ICNIRP en SCENIHR blijken geen deugdelijke wetenschappelijke evaluatie te maken van de schadelijke effecten van RF-straling, zoals gedocumenteerd is in het onderzoek … Deze twee kleine organisaties produceren rapporten die het bestaan van wetenschappelijke gepubliceerde studies over de bijbehorende risico’s lijken te ontkennen.” – Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation, L. Hardell & R. Nyberg, MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 3 Jan 2020.

How much is safe? Radiation authorities rely on controversial group for safety advice – Investigate Europe

FCC: Captured Agency

Zwitserse verzekeraar Swiss Re: elektromagnetische straling hoogste risicoklasse

Grote Oostenrijkse verzekeraar vindt effecten van mobieltjes op EEG en eiwit-aanmaak

Lloyd’s insurance company does not cover health damage caused by electromagnetic radiation

Antwoord van de Europese Commissie
In vraag E-003975/2018 van Nicola Caputo (S&D) wordt de Europese Commissie verzocht of zij van plan is een Europese taskforce op te richten van onafhankelijke en onpartijdige wetenschappers op het gebied van elektromagnetische velden, om de gezondheidsrisico’s te onderzoeken. In haar antwoord verklaart de Europese Commissie dat “krachtens artikel 168 van het Verdrag betreffende de Werking van de Europese Unie de primaire verantwoordelijkheid voor de bescherming van de bevolking tegen mogelijke schadelijke gevolgen van elektromagnetische velden bij de lidstaten blijft berusten, met inbegrip van de keuze van de te nemen maatregelen op basis van leeftijd en gezondheidstoestand”.

Duitsland: petitie tegen 5G behaalt meer dan 50.000 handtekeningen
Een Duitse petitie tegen 5G is 54.643 maal ondertekend, en moet nu behandeld worden in het parlement, meldt Diagnose: Funk. In de petitie wordt het Duitse parlement verzocht om de procedure voor het toekennen van 5G-frequenties te schorsen op basis van wetenschappelijk gerechtvaardigde twijfels over de veiligheid van deze technologie.

Nederland: 18.000 keer ondertekende petitie ‘Verminder Electrosmog – 5G Nee’ overhandigd aan leden van de Tweede Kamer

Overhandiging van de petitie ‘Verminder Electrosmog‘ aan de Tweede Kamer op 25 juni:

Zie ook Bellen schaadt cellen, EU negeert gezondheidsrisico’s 5G – De Groene Amsterdammer

en Amerikaanse senator Blumenthal bezorgd over potentiële gezondheidsrisico’s 5G-technologie.

NOS-journaal 9 sep. 2019: 5G demonstratie in Den Haag: ... urnaal.mp4

Honderden deelnemers in Amsterdam bij mars tegen 5G (NOS)

NOS-journaal 25 jan. 2020: 5G demonstratie in Amsterdam. Er werd op deze dag op 250 plaatsen over de wereld gedemonstreerd tegen 5G: ... 122020.mp4

Met dank aan Stichting EHS / Rob v/d Boom.

Bron: ->> ... en-van-5g/

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:16
by baphomet
5G Health Risks; The War Between Technology and Human Beings


Over 180 scientists and doctors in almost 40 countries are warning the world about 5G health risks. These scientists’ response to “Resolution 1815 of the Council of Europe” spells it out quite succinctly:

“We, the undersigned scientists, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF)… and has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”

If you’re not alarmed about 5G radiation dangers, you should be…

Learn more about the dangers of cellphone radiation. Watch this full-length video free…
Email Address

I would like to sign up to receive emails from Gaia.
With download speeds up to 20 to 30X faster than 4G, 5G promises a new world, including becoming the foundation for self-driving cars while also causing a long list of potential health risks. “5G Cancer” is actually a thing. The cities of Brussels and Geneva have even blocked trials and banned upgrades to 5G out of this concern.

The difference between 4G and 5G in terms of gigahertz, the unit of alternating current (AC) or electromagnetic (EM) waves that affect the transmission speeds of devices, is significant. 5G technology promises radio millimeter bands in the 30 to 300 GHz range, while 4G tops out at around 6GHz. When applied to video latency, this translates to speeds up to 60 to 120 times faster.

Before 2G, 3G, and 4G, radio frequencies were benign. We never worried whether or not our drive-time radio shows would fry our brains. Sadly, once the concept of wireless “G” technology was initiated, we began exposing the global public to frequencies akin to microwaves at 1 billion cycles per second.

Humans, animals and the environment have all been at risk for years. While 4G was bad enough, 5G takes the game to a whole new level of insanity.

5G (or 5th Generation) refers to the latest advancement in wireless systems. 5G promises to bring larger channels, higher speeds, larger packets of data, exponential responsiveness, and the ability to connect a host of devices from a single location. At the start, 5G networks won’t all work the same. Some will be slow, and some of these networks will be super-fast, but with limited coverage. Eventually, they will form a global grid, unlike anything the Earth has seen.

While it would be fair to assume that 5G technology has been tested for risks, this is simply not the case. There is no compelling data on health risks. When 5G launches, it will be the first actual test on human beings ever performed. This is unprecedented for such a wide-scale, public tech launch.

While 4G’s wavelengths travel along the surface of the skin, 5G’s millimeter waves are more insidious. When 5G wavelengths are emitted, our skin will automatically absorb them, which will naturally cause the skin to rise in temperature.

Already live in three countries, 5G is the first global electromagnetic radiation test on human beings in the history of Planet Earth. While most wireless industry executives kibosh the long list of legitimate 5G health concerns, most scientists believe that the public is in danger and that further tests are needed.

Does 5G Cause Cancer?
Many scientists understand that the electromagnetic radiation leaking through the doors of our microwave ovens are carcinogenic, and therefore, can cause cancer. Most of these scientists also believe that these waves are mutagenic, meaning they change the DNA structure of living beings.

The launch of 5G will be similar to turning on your microwave, opening its door, and leaving it on for the rest of your life. There’s a good reason why hundreds of scientists are taking action against the wireless industry.

Are 5G Towers Dangerous?
For the past ten years, 5G technology has been in development. Originally planned as a layer atop 3G and 4G, 5G is fast becoming a world of its own.

Every cell tower in your neighborhood emits radio frequency (RF) radiation. Radiation causes cancer. By 2021, every city will have 5G towers and cell stations. These devices will be on the top or side of millions of buildings throughout the world.

The wireless industry is not just building an infrastructure that provides faster downloads; it’s building a global microwave oven.

Yes, 5G towers and mini-stations are extremely dangerous. Not only are the shorter millimeter waves more hazardous to human beings, because of the intensity of the technology, but it will also require millions of more mini cell towers than before, potentially one tower per 2 to 8 houses. This means a human being’s RF radiation exposure will not only increase, but it will also exponentially increase within months.

These towers are not only dangerous; they’re lethal – and should be considered a crime against humanity.

Health Risks of 5G Technology
While there is a lot of chatter against the anti-5G community, there are also a lot of compelling discussions between scientists who are waging war against the untested technology.

In general, radiation does one major thing to human beings and animals – it destroys our DNA, either by forcing the DNA to mutate or by killing specific groups of cells, all of which lead to cancer.

Here’s what to expect if you experience prolonged exposure to radiation:


Hair Loss

Decreased appetite

Low energy

General malaise

Damaged bone marrow

Damaged organs

Deep depression



Incapacitation and Death

How to Protect Yourself from 5G
Besides moving to Mars or the Moon, we are limited in ways to protect ourselves from this dangerous technology. Cell tower radiation health effects are real. Because there will be thousands of these towers and stations in every city, it will be almost impossible to avoid them. Given how addicted we are to our devices, the general public will tend toward risking life and limb to support our screen-related addictions.

That said, there are some things we can do to protect ourselves from radiation. The more we focus on our health and diet, the more our immune systems can defend against the challenges related to 5G radiation.

Spirulina, Wheat Grass, Vitamin C, and similar supplements are consumable forms of sunlight, which will always improve our health and raise our vibrations. Yoga, meditation, chanting, mantras and other forms of prayer can also be beneficial in protecting our life-energies.

While fear can weaken our electromagnetic fields, love, intimacy and social vulnerability can strengthen them. The most important thing we can do is focus on improving our health, states of mind and exposure to nature. We always have control of our future, even if the general public is headed in another direction.

Here are a few ideas to give you a fighting chance:

Do not live near a cell tower or mini station.
Purchase an EMF shield, and continue to measure the levels of radiation within 100 feet of your home.
Eat healthily and take immune-boosting supplements.
Spend lots of time in the forest.
Refrain from using your cell phone for long periods, including never keeping your cell phone in your bedroom.
When traveling with your cell phone, store it in an EMF protective bag.
Consider purchasing some Orgonite, which reportedly scatters electromagnetic fields and turns them into beneficial ones. Dr. Wilhelm Reich developed this unique composite.
Continually educate yourself about the wireless industry and the global government support of this insane endeavor.
Remain strong, stay out of fear and continue to improve your vibration through positive thinking, forgiveness, and increased attention toward your mental, emotional and physical health.

*Correction 6/24/19: A previous version of this article made it sound as though “Resolution 1815 of the Council of Europe” recommended the moratorium on 5G when it was the consortium of 180 scientists and doctors mentioned in the opening paragraph.

Bron: ->> ... man-beings

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:17
by baphomet

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:17
by baphomet

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:18
by baphomet

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:20
by baphomet

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:20
by baphomet

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:21
by baphomet

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:21
by baphomet

Re: 5G (evaarlijk)?

Posted: Mon 23 Mar 2020, 22:22
by baphomet