Amerika en Iran steggelen verder

Politiek en oorlog zijn onlosmakelijk met elkaar verbonden en alles over politiek en oorlog kun je hier terugvinden.
Gebruikersavatar
Tobi
Super QFF-er
Super QFF-er
Berichten: 1863
Lid geworden op: wo 21 aug 2013, 18:13

ma 12 mar 2012, 23:50

We have been sent the request to explain this news

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/iran-rele ... d-us-drone

"President Barack Obama said that the U.S. wants the top-secret aircraft back. 'We have asked for it back. We'll see how the Iranians respond,' Obama said during a White House news conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki on Monday".

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... craft.html


“Some U.S. experts expressed skepticism that Iran would be capable of such hacking“.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/irans-capture- ... 05580.html

In response to above question,

There is no Hacking , but the use of advanced space technology.

In the past in this forum and in my presentations around Europe and in my international interviews in the past months, I have explained again and again that the Keshe Foundation and Iranian spaceship program has the capability of radar blockage and capture of material in airborne condition (listen to the presentation links on the website

http://www.keshefoundation.com/en/media-a-papers ).

The Islamic republic of Iran has the capability of capture and landing of any flying object irrespective of their size and speed as seen with capture of one of the most advanced flying crafts in these above videos and the request of so called the most advanced nation on earth for its toy back.

In this case, there has been no malfunctioning of the craft, but this has been a simple capture and landing of an object at high speed through advanced space programs.

other questions asked:
Why US could not destroy the craft remotely as it is fitted with the necessary self-destruction systems.

The Iran spaceship program has the capability of jamming and blocking any incoming radar as we have explained month ago on this forum, and now we see the practical use of the technology.
If the craft was crashed, why did it not explode or no damaged can be seen?

The craft has been air-picked-up and been put down on its belly through the use of field forces.

Iran has and will protect its territorial integrity through the use of its advanced space technologies, which it has acquired through new space programme and Iran will not use this technology for aggression, but for only showing to other nations that the time of nuclear and so called western advance military technology has come to an end.

In my inputs in this forum over past years I have informed the readers of these capabilities of this new technology.

The size of the 27 meters of the craft is no problem to cover and the speed of the craft is child-play for this new space program.

We salute the advancement in space technology of Iranian scientists and thank them for the peaceful use of this new technology and I am sure we will see more in the coming near future how space will be a peaceful place with this technology in the hand of peace loving nation of Iran.

The Foundation is ready to release the second stage of more advanced technology of this class in early next year as we are putting the final touches to its development.

We invite the US government and other nations to enter into negotiation with the Foundation and The Iranian government for disclosure of the full space technology to all nations simultaneously that there shall be no more war race, but a pace race to join and conquer the space and not each others little peace of lands so called nations, this offer stands and is extended to all nations irrespective of their colour, race and religion.

We have shown the original system on 3rd of the December 2011 in Gent in Belgium in a public demonstration for the first time and now the use of the technology in shown by the nation which has its rights to it.
http://www.keshefoundation.com/phpbb/vi ... 3900#p3900

topic die ik net geopend heb over deze man en zijn zooi: index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&c ... Itemid=120
Moraliteit ∝ Vrijheid
Real eyes realize real lies!!
Natural Law: The REAL law of attraction | The end of all evil
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: #F#
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23162
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

di 20 mar 2012, 03:59

20.000-25.000 Russische soldaten op 200 km van de grens met Iran...
Russia Deploying Troops for Temporary Dagestan Reinforcement

Russia is sending a “temporary detachment” of troops into the southern region of Dagestan, whose border lies about 200 kilometers (124 miles) north of Iran, to combat terrorism, the Interior Ministry said.

“We are talking about a temporary deployment and coordination to prevent and counter terrorism and extremism across the whole territory of Dagestan,” Vyacheslav Makhmudov, a spokesman for the regional Interior Ministry, said from the republic’s capital city, Makhachkala.

About 1,000 troops are being moved from the nearby region of Chechnya to form temporary police units in municipalities with “complicated criminal conditions,” said Magomed Baachilov, the secretary of Dagestan’s state security council. The realignment of forces was ordered by Interior Minister Rashid Nurgaliev, with Oleg Kizhayev, a police colonel, named in charge of the ministry detachment in Dagestan, the Interior Ministry’s main directorate for the North Caucasus said on its website today.

The authorities were deploying 20,000 to 25,000 federal troops from Khankala, the main Russian army base in Chechnya, according to reports published in Caucasian Knot, a Moscow-based news and analysis group that tracks the situation in the North and South Caucasus, and the weekly Dagestani publication Chernovik, which cited unidentified local law-enforcement officials. A convoy of armored personnel carriers and military vehicles was seen moving toward southern Dagestan from March 14 to March 17, the reports said.
Separatist Insurgency

The North Caucasus has been the scene of separatist violence since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Federal forces fought two wars against rebels in Chechnya, and violence has been flaring in neighboring Dagestan, with a border shootout reported last month, a suicide bombing on March 6 and an attack on a local polling station during the March 4 presidential election. The government blames continuing violence on Islamist fighters and insurgents.

Law-enforcement agencies killed 171 militants and arrested 211 in Dagestan last year, with another eight surrendering without a fight, said Baachilov of the region’s state security council. One hundred “active members” of the insurgency remain after 15 have been killed in the first two months of this year, he said.

Vladimir Putin, then prime minister under late President Boris Yeltsin, sent ground troops into Chechnya in 1999 after four bombings of apartment buildings in Russia in September that year and an attack by Chechen fighters in August on Dagestani villages, which were occupied in an attempt to form an Islamic republic. Putin, who won a six-year term in the Kremlin in the March 4 election, served as president between 2000 and 2008.
Bron: http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0 ... nt-1-.html
1119 AD
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23162
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

di 20 mar 2012, 04:02

Er worden nog meer schaakstukken verplaatst...
Russian Anti-Terror Troops Arrive in Syria

A Russian military unit has arrived in Syria, according to Russian news reports, a development that a United Nations Security Council source told ABC News was "a bomb" certain to have serious repercussions.

Russia, one of President Bashar al-Assad's strongest allies despite international condemnation of the government's violent crackdown on the country's uprising, has repeatedly blocked the United Nations Security Council's attempts to halt the violence, accusing the U.S. and its allies of trying to start another war.

Now the Russian Black Sea fleet's Iman tanker has arrived in the Syrian port of Tartus on the Mediterranean Sea with an anti-terror squad from the Russian Marines aboard according to the Interfax news agency. The Assad government has insisted it is fighting a terrorist insurgency. The presence of Russian troops in Syria could be a "pretty obvious" show of support to the regime, according to Russian security expert Mark Galeotti.

"No one thinks of the Russians as anything but Assad's last friends," said Galeotti, professor of global affairs at New York University.

The Iman replaced another Russian ship "which had been sent to Syria for demonstrating (sic) the Russian presence in the turbulent region and possible evacuation of Russian citizens," the Black Sea Fleet told Interfax.

RIA Novosti, a news outlet with strong ties to the Kremlin, trumpeted the news in a banner headline that appeared only on its Arabic language website. The Russian embassy to the U.S. and to the U.N. had no comment, saying they have "no particular information on" the arrival of a Russian anti-terrorism squad to Syria.

Moscow has long enjoyed a cozy relationship with the Assad regime, to which it sells billions of dollars of weapons. In return Russia has maintained a Navy base at Tartus, which gives it access to the Mediterranean.

Last week Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Russia had no plans to send troops to Syria.

"As for the question whether I consider it necessary to confront the United States in Syria and ensure our military presence there… in order to take part in military actions -- no. I believe this would be against Russia's national interests," Lavrov told lawmakers, according to RIA Novosti.

Russia's Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov denied reports that Russian special forces were operating inside Syria. He did say, however, that there are Russian military and technical advisors in the country.

U.S. State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said the U.S. government had not heard of the reports of Russian troops in Syria and declined to comment.
Bron + video: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/russian-a ... 2ea6V3-KuK
1119 AD
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23162
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

di 20 mar 2012, 04:03

[video][/video]
1119 AD
Gebruikersavatar
Toxopeus
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 4228
Lid geworden op: ma 15 nov 2010, 19:53

di 20 mar 2012, 04:04

Die Spetsnaz figuren kunnen zich daar lekker uitleven.
In de erfenis der eeuwen ligt veel wijsheid opgetast. Ook hier geldt: dwaas is hij die zijn eigen geschiedenis versmaadt.
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23162
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

di 20 mar 2012, 04:16

En nog meer nieuws dat wijst op nieuwe ontwikkelingen:
Russian FM: US to use Russian air base for military transit to Afghanistan under new deal

MOSCOW - The Russian foreign minister says a new deal allowing the United States to use a Russian air base for transit of troops and military cargo to Afghanistan will help ensure Russia's own security.

Sergey Lavrov said Wednesday that the agreement permitting the U.S. to use the air base in the city of Ulyanovsk on the Volga River would soon be considered by the Russian Cabinet.

Moscow has earlier provided the U.S. and other NATO nations with air corridors and railway routes for carrying supplies to and from Afghanistan. The new deal will for the first time allow the U.S. to set up a logistics facility for troops and cargo on the Russian territory.

Lavrov strongly defended the deal, saying that the success of NATO's mission in Afghanistan is good for Russia's national interests.
Bron: http://news.yahoo.com/russian-fm-us-rus ... 26671.html

Ik zei al eens, een tijdje terug tegen Nex dat die Russen gewoon meespelen en het lijkt er zo op dat men versneld uit Afghanistan wil, naar... Iran???

Ik noem maar eens wat hoor, en wat is er dan mooier dan samenwerken met de Ruski's om dan uiteindelijk straks de opbrengst (lees:olie) te verdelen....
1119 AD
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23162
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

di 20 mar 2012, 05:39

Russische soldaten on the move, en een verzoek tot een staak tot vuren van 2 uur en een bezoek aan Rusland, allemaal achter elkaar aan en dat binnen een paar uur...

De poep gaat nu steeds sneller richting de ventilator...
Russia joins Red Cross call for daily truce in Syria

Russia has joined the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in calling for a daily two-hour humanitarian ceasefire in Syria.

In a statement, the foreign ministry called on the government "and all armed groups who oppose it" to agree to ceasefires "without delay".

Russia has twice vetoed Western-backed draft resolutions on Syria at the UN Security Council.

Its call came hours after clashes erupted in part of the Syrian capital.

The head of the ICRC, Jakob Kellenberger, had travelled to Moscow to discuss a ceasefire arrangement with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

The organisation says a daily pause in fighting is needed to evacuate the wounded from the worst affected areas and allow in food and medicine.

Mr Kellenberger said Russia's support for its appeal was "very important" and that he noted it with "satisfaction and gratitude".

"The most important issue for us is to ensure humanitarian ceasefires as soon as possible," Russian media quoted him as saying.

He said the prospect of more Syrian cities being subjected to the intense military bombardment seen in Homs earlier this year was "absolutely unacceptable".
'Concrete results'

Russia is a key ally of Syria and, along with China, has thwarted attempts to agree to a UN resolution condemning President Bashar al-Assad's actions.

In its statement, Moscow said it supported the ICRC's demands and urged the Syrian authorities to give the organisation "access to all detained persons in Syria following the protests".

The BBC's Daniel Sandford in Moscow says the announcement could be interpreted as a hardening of Russia's public position on Syria, though Moscow has been calling for a permanent ceasefire on both sides for months.

ICRC spokeswoman Victoria Zotikova told AFP news agency the organisation hoped to see "concrete results of such meetings on the ground in the coming days and weeks".

The UN says more than 8,000 people have been killed in the year-long uprising, while tens of thousands of people have fled their homes.

Overnight, the Syrian capital, Damascus, experienced some of its heaviest fighting since the uprising began.

Witnesses said machine-guns and rocket-propelled grenades were heard from the heavily guarded district of al-Mezze, where several security buildings are located and which has seen several large anti-government protests.

Syrian TV said three "terrorists" and a security force member had been killed, while the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said four rebel fighters had died.

State television said that in addition to the dead, several people on both sides were injured.

The latest incident follows bomb blasts in Damascus and the northern city of Aleppo over the weekend in which nearly 30 people died and scores were wounded.

On Monday, a team of experts representing the joint UN and Arab League envoy Kofi Annan arrived in Syria to press his proposals for a ceasefire and monitoring.

A spokesman for Mr Annan told AFP news agency the group were experienced in "peacekeeping and mediation" and would stay in Syria "for as long as they are making progress to reach agreement on practical steps to implement Mr Annan's proposals".

Mr Assad is trying to quell an increasingly armed rebellion that sprang from a fierce crackdown on peaceful pro-democracy protests a year ago.

He insists his troops are fighting "armed gangs" seeking to destabilise Syria.
Bron: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-17438937
1119 AD
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23162
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

di 17 jun 2014, 00:53

VS sluit militaire samenwerking Iran tegen jihadisten uit


De Amerikaanse regering heeft maandag beklemtoond dat de Verenigde Staten niet militair gaan samenwerken met Iran in de strijd tegen jihadisten in Irak.

Het Witte Huis zegt in een verklaring dat eventuele gesprekken met Iran niet over militaire acties of de coördinatie daarvan gaan.

De VS denken overigens beslist niet aan grondtroepen voor dergelijke acties, beklemtoonde het Witte Huis. President Barack Obama zou vooral bekijken wat er vanuit de lucht tegen de jihadisten kan worden ondernomen.

Washington zou er in een gesprek met Iran op aandringen dat Iran zijn invloed bij de Iraakse leiders gebruikt om de belangen van alle bevolkingsgroepen te dienen en niet alleen die van de sjiitische meerderheid.

Door de opmars van soennitische extremisten afgelopen week in het noorden van Irak, staan Washington en Teheran aan dezelfde kant in een conflict dat Irak als eenheidsstaat bedreigt. Washington en Teheran zijn al 35 jaar tegenstanders van elkaar en hebben geen diplomatieke betrekkingen.

Irak

De sjiitische regering van premier Nuri al-Maliki in Irak marginaliseert al jaren de soennitische minderheid die in het noorden en noordwesten haar basis heeft. Daar zijn soennitische ISIS-extremisten, voortgekomen uit al-Qaeda, in opmars.

De Iraakse strijdkrachten leken niet gemotiveerd of niet bij machte veel uit te richten en namen bijvoorbeeld in de tweede stad van het land, Mosul, vorige week de benen.
Bron: ->> http://www.nu.nl/buitenland/3804056/vs- ... isten.html
Gebruikersavatar
Toxopeus
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 4228
Lid geworden op: ma 15 nov 2010, 19:53

di 17 jun 2014, 18:59

De grootste vijand van je (gecreëerde) vijand is je beste vriend...

#podcast36
In de erfenis der eeuwen ligt veel wijsheid opgetast. Ook hier geldt: dwaas is hij die zijn eigen geschiedenis versmaadt.
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: baphomet
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
ThaViking
Super QFF-er
Super QFF-er
Berichten: 528
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:10

wo 18 jun 2014, 22:17

De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: blackbox
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
Toxopeus
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 4228
Lid geworden op: ma 15 nov 2010, 19:53

di 20 jan 2015, 21:45

Vertrouwen

zondag 18 januari 2015
"Onze" politieke leiders en "onze vrije" media tamboereren altijd met vertrouwen. Geen vertrouwen? Hoe durf je. Een aardig voorbeeld van dat vertrouwen steekt de kop boven water in een rechtszaak in de VS. Om een lang verhaal kort te maken: de schrijver James Risen kreeg van een bron vertrouwelijke informatie en wilde dat publiceren. In eerste instantie in de krant New York Times in 2003. Dat werd niet geplaatst. Daarna in zijn boek State of War dat in 2006 verscheen. Er loopt nu nog een rechtszaak tegen Risen en tegen zijn bron, Jeffrey Sterling.
Wat inmiddels blijkt is dat de CIA een operatie had lopen om Iran te voorzien van geheime documenten om een atoombom te maken. Dat zou gaan via een Rus. De clou was dat er ergens in de documenten een vautje zou zitten, waardoor die abom er niet zou komen. Maar de echte clou was dat Iran beschuldigd kon worden van het vervaardigen van atoomwapens en de VS dus rustig een "preventieve oorlog" kon beginnen. Een soort Hitleriaanse truc. Leuk he, hoe zo’n bastion van vrije meningsuiting en persvrijheid als de NYT (opnieuw!) als handlanger zou dienen voor een vuile oorlog. En "onze" politici, ach...

Dit bericht is verschenen in Kleintje Muurkrant actueel
http://www.stelling.nl/kleintje/actueel ... html#start
In de erfenis der eeuwen ligt veel wijsheid opgetast. Ook hier geldt: dwaas is hij die zijn eigen geschiedenis versmaadt.
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: baphomet
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23162
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

do 29 jan 2015, 18:52

CIA on Trial in Virginia for Planting Nuke Evidence in Iran

written by david swanson
wednesday january 14, 2015

Since Tuesday and continuing for the coming three weeks, an amazing trial is happening in U.S. District Court at 401 Courthouse Square in Alexandria, Va. The trial is open to the public, and among the upcoming witnesses is Condoleezza Rice, but -- unlike the Chelsea Manning trial -- most of the seats at this somewhat similar event are empty.

The media is mostly MIA, and during lunch break the two tables at the cafe across the street are occupied, one by the defendant and his lawyers, the other by a small group of activists, including former CIA officer Ray McGovern, blogger Marcy Wheeler (follow her report of every detail at ExposeFacts.org), and Norman Solomon who has organized a petition at DropTheCharges.org -- the name of which speaks for itself.

Why Gareth Porter (and others who are focused on the decades-long Western effort to frame Iran with having or pursuing nuclear weapons) are not here, I do not know. Why the public is not here, I do not know. Except that Jeffrey Sterling has not been even so much as demonized in the major media.

Jeffrey who?

Some people have heard of James Risen, a New York Times reporter who refused to name his source for a story. Damn right. Good for him. But what was the story and whom did the government want named as a source? Ah. Those questions might seem obvious, but the reporting on James Risen has avoided them like the plague for years and years now. And the independent media is not always as good at creating a story as it is at improving on stories in the corporate press.

Jeffrey Sterling went to Congress with his story. He was a CIA case officer. He is accused of having taken his story to James Risen. The prosecution is quite clearly establishing, against its own interest, during the course of this trial already, that numerous people were in on the story and could have taken it to Risen. If Sterling is to be proved guilty of the non-crime of blowing the whistle on a crime, the prosecution has yet to hint at how that will be done.

But what is the story? What is the crime that Sterling exposed for that tiny sliver of the population that's interested enough to have listened? (Sure, Risen's book was a "best seller" but that's a low hurdle; not a single prospective juror in Alexandria had read the book; even a witness involved in the case testified Wednesday that he'd only read the one relevant chapter.)

The story is this. The CIA drew up plans for a key part of a nuclear bomb (what a CIA officer on Wednesday described in his testimony as "the crown jewels" of a nuclear weapons program), inserted flaws in the plans, and then had a Russian give those flawed plans to Iran.

During the trial on Wednesday morning, the prosecution's witnesses made clear both that aiding Iran in developing a part of a bomb would be illegal under U.S. export control laws, and that they were aware at the time that there was the possibility of what they were doing constituting just such aid.

So, why do it?

And why is this trial going on for hours and hours without the slightest relevance to prosecuting Jeffrey Sterling, sounding for all intents and purposes like a defense of the CIA?

Well, the stated reason for this operation, known as Operation Merlin, was to slow down Iran's nuclear weapons program by causing Iranian scientists to spend time and resources on a doomed plan that would never work.

A very young, very very white jury is hearing the case made thusly. The U.S. government lacked evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program and not long after came out with an assessment that such a program did not exist and had not existed for some time. Nonetheless, years of effort and millions of dollars went into trying to slow the program down by a period of months. The CIA created a design, drawing, and parts list for a Russian nuclear fire set (the nuclear bomb component). They intentionally made it incomplete because supposedly no actual Russian scientist would credibly have complete knowledge of it. Then they told their designated Russian to tell the Iranians that it was incomplete because he wanted money, after which he would gladly produce what he couldn't credibly have.

According to one cable read aloud in court, the CIA would have liked to give Iran the actual device already constructed for them, but didn't because it wouldn't have been credible for their Russian to have it.

Before getting their Russian to spend years (anything shorter would not have been credible, they say) getting in touch with the Iranians, the U.S. scientists spent 9 months building the device from the plans and then proceeded to test it in a lab. Then they introduced multiple "flaws" into the plans and tested each flaw. Then they gave their flawed plans to their own team of scientists who weren't in on their cockamamie scheme. In five months, those scientists spotted and fixed enough of the flaws to build a fire set and get it to work in a lab. This was considered a success, we're told, because the Iranians would take a lot longer than five months, and because getting something to work outside of a lab is much harder.

To their credit, the defense lawyers' cross-examining of witnesses suggests that they find much of this ludicrous. "Have you ever seen a Russian parts list in English?" was one question asked on Wednesday. Another question: "You say you had people experienced in detecting flaws in fire set plans. Is that because there is a market in such things?" The judge sustained an objection to that last question.

The stated motivation for Operation Merlin is patent nonsense that cannot be explained by any level of incompetence or bureaucratic dysfunction or groupthink.

Here's another explanation of both Operation Merlin and of the defensiveness of the prosecution and its witnesses (in particular "Bob S.") at the prosecution of Jeffrey Sterling which is thus far failing to prosecute Jeffrey Sterling. This was an effort to plant nuke plans on Iran, part of the pattern described in Gareth Porter's latest book.

Marcy Wheeler reminds me of related efforts to plant English-language nuke plans around the same period of time or not long after. There was the laptop of death, later reprised for another war marketing effort. There were nuke plans and parts buried in a backyard as well.

Why give Iran flawed plans for a key part of a nuclear weapon? Why fantasize about giving Iran the thing already built (which wouldn't delay Iran's non-existent program much). Because then you can point out that Iran has them. And you won't even be lying, as with forged documents claiming Iraq is buying uranium or hired subcontractors pretending aluminum tubes are for nuclear weapons. With Operation Merlin you can work some real dark magic: You can tell the truth about Iran having what you so desperately want Iran to appear to have.

Why go to such efforts? Why do Operation Merlin, whatever the motivation(s) may have been?

Democracy!

Of course.

But when "Bob S." is asked who authorized this madness he doesn't say. He clearly suggests that it initiated within the CIA, but avoids specifics. When Jeffrey Sterling told Congress, Congress didn't tell the public. And when somebody told James Risen, the U.S. government -- so outraged over assaults on freedom of the press in Paris -- started hauling people into court.

And the public doesn't even show up to watch the trial.

Attend this trial, people. Report on it. Report the truth. You'll have no competition. The big media are not in the room.

Reprinted with author's permission from War is a Crime.
via:->> http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archive ... e-in-iran/
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23162
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

do 29 jan 2015, 19:07

#podcast64
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23162
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

zo 08 feb 2015, 20:26

Ayatollah Khamenei niet tegen nucleair akkoord tussen Westen en Iran

Gepubliceerd: 08 februari 2015 14:38
Laatste update: 08 februari 2015 16:12

De Iraanse leider ayatollah Ali Khamenei zal een akkoord over het nucleaire programma van Iran steunen, mits het een goede deal is.
De geestelijk leider is ''niet voor een slechte deal''. ''Geen akkoord is dan beter dan een slecht akkoord dat onze belangen niet behartigt.''

Dat zei Khamenei zondag nadat de Iraanse minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Mohammad Javad Zarif een onverwachte ontmoeting had met zijn Amerikaanse ambtsgenoot John Kerry. Die spraken elkaar tijdens de Europese Veiligheidsconferentie in München.

Iran onderhandelt al lange tijd met de Verenigde Staten, Groot-Brittannië, Frankrijk, Duitsland, Rusland en China over de productie van atoomwapens. De zes wereldmachten willen dat Iran zijn nucleaire programma opschort in ruil voor het versoepelen van sancties die zijn opgelegd aan Teheran. De punten waarover het meest gesteggeld wordt, zijn onder meer de snelheid waarmee de sancties worden opgeheven en de omvang van het atoomprogramma. Voor 30 juni moet er een akkoord zijn.

Beslissende stem

Khamenei heeft als ayatollah de beslissende stem en de macht om de wet en de regering te overstijgen. Hij stond tot nu toe sceptisch tegenover een akkoord over atoomwapens.

Minister Zarif zei na afloop van zijn gesprek met Kerry dat ze op een punt zitten waarop een deal kan worden bereikt. Voorwaarde is wel dat de sancties nog meer worden versoepeld. ''Iedereen moet begrijpen dat dat de enige manier is om met Iran te onderhandelen."

Uitstel van de deadline is ook in niemands belang, volgens Zarif. De datum waarop er overeenstemming moet zijn is namelijk in november al een keer uitgesteld en dat was volgens Zarif ook ''onnodig". Ondanks dat is het volgens hem ook ''niet het eind van de wereld als er geen deal komt".

Door: ANP
via:->> http://www.nu.nl/buitenland/3988524/aya ... -iran.html
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15966
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

ma 09 jan 2017, 15:21

Amerikaanse marine lost waarschuwingsschoten naar schepen Iraanse garde
09 januari 2017 14:03
http://www.nu.nl/buitenland/4376308/ame ... garde.html


De Amerikaanse marine heeft zondag waarschuwingsschoten afgevuurd naar vier schepen van de Iraanse Revolutionaire Garde, toen die met hoge snelheid op een schip van de Amerikaase marine afkwamen.

Dat melden verschillende media maandagmiddag (Nederlandse tijd).

De Amerikaanse marine probeerde aanvankelijk contact te leggen met de schepen in de Straat van Hormuz, met het verzoek hun snelheid te minderen. Toen er niet werd gereageerd, werden er drie schoten gelost en dropte een helikopter een rookbom.

De schepen van het Iraanse militaire elitekorps passeerden het Amerikaanse marineschip USS Mahan op 800 meter, liet een anonieme bron maandag aan persbureau Reuters weten. De Mahan escorteerde op dat moment twee andere schepen van de marine.
Tehran has repeatedly threatened to close the path for the US and other international powers during political tensions. The Strait of Hormuz is crucial to both regional security and the global economy, and accounts for about one-third of global oil shipments. Keeping maritime traffic through the strait open is essential for gas and oil importers such as the US and China.

bron: https://www.rt.com/news/373052-us-navy-iran-shots/
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: blackbox
Omhoog
Plaats reactie

Terug naar “Politiek / Oorlog”