Aarde warmt op of kleine ijstijd?!

Alle wetenschappelijke topics tref je hier aan.
Gebruikersavatar
Het Dolle Eland
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 2546
Lid geworden op: zo 24 okt 2010, 17:26

zo 14 okt 2018, 15:41

De aarde hoeft helemaal niet op te warmen.

Diamonds are forever, forever, forever....

https://bigthink.com/philip-perry/scien ... e=Facebook
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: baphomet
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15961
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

ma 15 okt 2018, 12:42

:D 80% belasting op contant betalen zie aankomen
Betalen door te pinnen is iets minder belastend voor het milieu dan betalen met contant geld. Een betaling met een pinpas kost net zoveel stroom als het verbruik van een spaarlamp van 8 watt die anderhalf uur brandt.

bron meer blah: https://www.nu.nl/klimaat/5514722/pinne ... talen.html
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: baphomet
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23147
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

ma 15 okt 2018, 13:33

Dus Nu.nl bepaald feitelijk even voor de rest van de wereld dat deze meneer klimaatexpert is....?

https://www.nu.nl/overig/5510411/vragen ... -berg.html

LOL
Gebruikersavatar
Het Dolle Eland
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 2546
Lid geworden op: zo 24 okt 2010, 17:26

ma 15 okt 2018, 13:36

combi schreef:
ma 15 okt 2018, 12:42
:D 80% belasting op contant betalen zie aankomen
Betalen door te pinnen is iets minder belastend voor het milieu dan betalen met contant geld. Een betaling met een pinpas kost net zoveel stroom als het verbruik van een spaarlamp van 8 watt die anderhalf uur brandt.

bron meer blah: https://www.nu.nl/klimaat/5514722/pinne ... talen.html
8 Watt : 90 minuten en weer gedeeld door 60 seconden is 0,001 Watt/sec. als ik het goed doe.

Hmmmm... dat is 5000 watt per seconde (gemiddeld 5000 ATM transacties per/seconde wereld wijd).

Is dus 300.000 Watt/minuut.
Is dus 18.000.000 Watt/uur.
Is dus 432.000.000 Watt/dag.
Is dus 157.680.000.000 Watt/jaar.

Kan iemand de Kilowattprijs eventjes berekenen? ;D
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: baphomet
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23147
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

ma 15 okt 2018, 14:05

Als google ipv een witte een zwarte achtergrond zou nemen zouden we nog veel meer centjes besparen, geldt ook voor overheidswebsites trouwens die doorgaans wit zijn...
Gebruikersavatar
#F#
Super QFF-er
Super QFF-er
Berichten: 467
Lid geworden op: vr 17 dec 2010, 23:04

ma 15 okt 2018, 23:21

Het Dolle Eland schreef:
ma 15 okt 2018, 13:36


8 Watt : 90 minuten en weer gedeeld door 60 seconden is 0,001 Watt/sec. als ik het goed doe.

Hmmmm... dat is 5000 watt per seconde (gemiddeld 5000 ATM transacties per/seconde wereld wijd).

Is dus 300.000 Watt/minuut.
Is dus 18.000.000 Watt/uur.
Is dus 432.000.000 Watt/dag.
Is dus 157.680.000.000 Watt/jaar.

Kan iemand de Kilowattprijs eventjes berekenen? ;D
Kwh kost hier ongeveer 0.25 €
Dus dat keer 18000 is 4500 €
Gebruikersavatar
Toxopeus
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 4225
Lid geworden op: ma 15 nov 2010, 19:53

ma 15 okt 2018, 23:50

baphomet schreef:
ma 15 okt 2018, 14:05
Als google ipv een witte een zwarte achtergrond zou nemen zouden we nog veel meer centjes besparen, geldt ook voor overheidswebsites trouwens die doorgaans wit zijn...
Dan is QFF Qlimaatneutraal :P
In de erfenis der eeuwen ligt veel wijsheid opgetast. Ook hier geldt: dwaas is hij die zijn eigen geschiedenis versmaadt.
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: baphomet
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
blackbox
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 6265
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:09

di 23 okt 2018, 12:31

Jet Streams Shift Across Europe Bringing Climate Chaos North America is Next



Some strange anomalies are now manifesting over Europe as the Equatorial Vortex and Polar vortex collide with 20C below normal and 20C above normal fronts collide. Climate chaos is an understatement to what has been seen in the last few days and what is expected over the next ten days across the continent. Record rains in Spain, Italy and tornadoes Cyprus. Hail feet deep paralyzes Rome.

Afbeelding
illuminati of my own reality
Gebruikersavatar
blackbox
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 6265
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:09

vr 26 okt 2018, 11:55

Alllll!!!...you Smug!



Geoengineering Startup Fund - Nestlé to Raise Prices - Al Gore Admits IPCC lies

illuminati of my own reality
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: ninti
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
Het Dolle Eland
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 2546
Lid geworden op: zo 24 okt 2010, 17:26

za 22 dec 2018, 23:48

Dust in the wind....

Tja... eerder dit jaar waaide grote hoeveelheden Sahara zand Zuid en Zuid-Oostelijk Europa binnen. Dat moest toch electrostatische lading opleveren in de atmosfeer dacht ik nog, maar wie ben ik denkikdanweerwel...

Maar het klopte... zéér zwaar weer volgde in diezelfde regio's met extreme hoge onweersintensiteit en bliksemontladingen, waterhozen, grote hoeveelheden neerslag, hagelbrokken en sneeuwdumpen. Met gemak kon met regelmaat koude Artctische lucht via Spanje/Portugal de genoemde regio binnen stormen (zie ook: door blackbox » di 23 okt 2018, 11:31)

En wat blijkt, de stofkorreltjes zijn groter dan men ooit heeft aangenomen.... 50x groter zelfs!

Giant dust is spreading across the world, defying the laws of physics
Giant particles of dust are being spread across the globe, and the physical forces responsible are still up in the air, hidden somewhere in the wind.

Whatever it is, this mysterious influence is so strong, it can transport particles 50 times bigger than we ever thought possible, carrying these huge pieces all the way from the arid Sahara Desert to the tropical Caribbean.

It's an achievement that should defy the laws of physics, which is rarely a good sign. It probably means we've gotten something wrong along the way, and in our ignorance, we may have overlooked an important driver of climate change.

For nearly 30 years, scientists have known that small particles of dust, kicked up in the Sahara, often ride on global winds to the Caribbean, 3,500 kilometres (2,000 kilometres) away from home.

Originally, this foreign cloud of desert dust was thought to contain particles no bigger than 0.01 to 0.02 millimetres in diameter.

But recently, when scientists began collecting samples of dust from floating buoys and underwater traps in the Atlantic Ocean, the sheer size of the particles defied their expectations.

Between 2013 and 2016, the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ) found some dust particles measuring 0.45 millimetres in diameter, nearly 50 times bigger than what global winds were once thought capable of carrying.

"These dust particles are whipped up from the Sahara Desert and carried between continents, and most people know them best when they end up settling on our cars or cause the kind of eerie orange skies we saw a year ago," explains co-author Giles Harrison, a researcher in atmospheric electricity at the University of Reading.

"However, existing ideas do not allow for such massive particles travelling in the atmosphere for such vast distances, suggesting that there is some as-yet-unknown atmospheric process or combination of processes keeping them airborne."

The bad news is, by underestimating what the winds can carry, we may have seriously thrown off our climate models.

After all, if large particles, like quartz, can be transported such vast distances, these materials could influence both cloud formation and the global climate system.

"This evidence of dust and ash being carried so far is significant because these particles influence radiation transfer around the Earth and carbon cycles in the oceans," says Harrison.

Dust may seem like an inconsequential bother, but if enough of it gathers in our atmosphere, it can tip a delicate balance, changing the course of incoming sunlight and heat emitted from the Earth.

As they scatter and absorb incoming solar radiation, these large particles have the power to actually change the clouds above, influencing both our planet's weather and climate.


By hanging out in the sky, all of this dust can even have an indirect impact on tropical cyclone development.

The amount of time that all of this heavy dust can hang out in the sky is staggering. And in the end, the research suggests that rain, and not just gravity, is responsible for many of the particles that end up falling from the sky.

Weighed down by such large burdens, acidic droplets of water are thus carried to the deepest parts of the ocean, further impacting food chains and the ocean carbon cycle.

But despite their far-reaching effects, most climate models to date have ignored these large dust particles. The physical laws on which these calculations are based just don't allow for particles bigger than 10 μm to travel so far, even at high wind velocities.

There has to be something else keeping these dust particles aloft - we just don't know what that something is. And while researchers have explored a few explanations, including vertical mixing, electric forces and turbulence, the answer continues to remain elusive.

"The fact that larger particles of dust keep floating in the atmosphere for a long time is considered to be in conflict with the physical laws of gravity," says lead author Michele van der Does, a researcher at NIOZ.

"We show that through a combination of forces and movements in the atmosphere the large dust pellets can indeed stay in the atmosphere for a longer time and have their influence there."

Now, the authors are calling for future climate models to incorporate the effects of much larger dust particles than ever before.

The research has been published in Science Advances.

BRON: https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/clima ... S1asXY3a_U
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: blackbox, combi, #F#
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
blackbox
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 6265
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:09

zo 23 dec 2018, 15:17

Atmosfeer is meer geladen waardoor er grotere particles de zwaartekracht kunnen trotseren.....denk ik dan maar zo weer wel.
illuminati of my own reality
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: Het Dolle Eland, #F#
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15961
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

ma 24 dec 2018, 10:45

REDEMPTION OF THE BEAST
The Carbon Cycle and the Demonization of CO2

by Randall W. Carlson (February 2017)
http://geocosmicrex.com/global-change/carboncycle/

knip

“After 30 years of measurements in the atmosphere and the oceans, the global atmospheric CO2 budget is still surprisingly uncertain.” They acknowledge the contribution of fossil fuel combustion on the observed increase in atmospheric concentrations but point out that the measured rise was only somewhat over half of the fossil fuel derived contribution. In estimating the fate of this missing carbon dioxide they point out that the uptake, or absorption, of CO2 attributed to the ocean was estimated to be between 26% and 44% of fossil CO2. Disinclined to believe the ocean was consuming that much they speculated that there must be a substantial, but as of yet, unidentified terrestrial sink. In conclusion the authors further comment that: “Our analysis thus suggests that there must be a terrestrial sink at temperate latitudes to balance the carbon budget . . . The mechanism of this C sink in unknown; its magnitude appears to be as large as 2.0 to 3.4 Gt of C per year . . .” Given that the total anthropogenic contribution of CO2 to the atmosphere is on the order of 6 Gt (gigatons) it is obvious that half of it is missing in action, so to speak.

knip

[Bender, Michael L., Mark Battle & Ralph F. Keeling (1998) The O2 Balance of the Atmosphere: A Tool for Studying the Fate of Fossil-Fuel CO2: Annual Review of Energy and Environment, Vol. 23, pp. 207-223]

“CO2 is added to the atmosphere by biomass burning and the combustion of fossil fuels. So added CO2 remains in the atmosphere. However, substantial amounts are taken up by the oceans and land biosphere, attenuating the atmospheric increase. . . Man is currently adding CO2 to the atmosphere at the rate of about 6.4 Gt C/yr by combusting fossil fuels and (to a small extent) by making concrete. We are adding another ~1 Gt C/yr by deforestation, mostly in the tropics. If all this CO2 remained in the atmosphere, the CO2 concentration of air would rise by about 3.5 ppm/year, much more than the observed increase of about 1.5 ppm/year. The difference between fossil-fuel input and accumulation, today as in the past, is attributable to the CO2 uptake by the oceans and by the growth of the land biosphere, as demonstrated by C. D. Keeling in a series of seminal publications.”

knip

“. . . It is the least chemical constituent of a mixture that determines the amount of reaction. A loss of nitrogen or oxygen equal to .0003 of the atmosphere would doubtless be wholly inconsequential, while that amount of loss of carbon dioxide would be fatal to life and to many important geological processes.” [see: Chamberlin, T. C. (1898) The Influence of Great Epochs of Limestone Formation upon the Constitution of the Atmosphere: The Journal of Geology, vol. 6, No. 6, (Sept.—Oct.) pp. 609 – 621]

Here Chamberlin points out the fact that even a miniscule decline in the relative concentration of atmospheric CO2 would have serious consequences for global plant life.



bron en (veel) meer: http://geocosmicrex.com/global-change/carboncycle/

“Redemption of the Beast” (part 2)
The Miracle of Photosynthesis
http://geocosmicrex.com/global-change/c ... n-cycle-2/
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: blackbox, Het Dolle Eland
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
Het Dolle Eland
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 2546
Lid geworden op: zo 24 okt 2010, 17:26

ma 24 dec 2018, 10:47

Inderdaad BB!

Die gedachte deel ik met je. En zélfs nóg extremer (maar ik denk dat je er ook zo extreem over denkt ;) ) ... Dat ooit (recentelijk) de electrische activiteit op aarde dermate sterker is geweest, dat mogelijkheden heeft geboden om nóg zwaarder materiaal met gemak te verplaatsen. En dan doel ik dus op de 'geheimzinnige' megalitische bouwwerken overal op deze planeet.

P.s. ik las laatst nog dat 'wetenschappers' een vliegtuigje hebben laten vliegen op de energie van de electrisch geladen deeltjes in de lucht.

Nou ja, hier staat het héle verhaal ;)

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586- ... www.svt.se


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0707-9


God Jul! O0
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: blackbox, NoMore
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
Toxopeus
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 4225
Lid geworden op: ma 15 nov 2010, 19:53

di 01 jan 2019, 00:05

In de erfenis der eeuwen ligt veel wijsheid opgetast. Ook hier geldt: dwaas is hij die zijn eigen geschiedenis versmaadt.
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: blackbox
Omhoog
Gebruikersavatar
#F#
Super QFF-er
Super QFF-er
Berichten: 467
Lid geworden op: vr 17 dec 2010, 23:04

vr 04 jan 2019, 12:30

Naar aanleiding van bovenstaand bericht...
https://andthentheresphysics.wordpress. ... d-nikolov/
De volgende gebruiker(s) zeggen bedankt: blackbox, ninti
Omhoog
Plaats reactie

Terug naar “Wetenschap”