Re: Het Plasma Universum, een introductie.

Alles puur natuur nier ;-)
Gebruikersavatar
Permuter 0.
Super QFF-er
Super QFF-er
Berichten: 1712
Lid geworden op: zo 22 aug 2010, 09:30

di 24 aug 2010, 15:03

Ieder jaar draaien wij vrolijk een rondje om de zon, maar is dat altijd zo geweest ? Op deze vraag en vele andere vragen vinden wij antwoord in de theorie van het Plasma Universum."The evidence of myth which points to Saturn having once occupied a position above Earth's north polar regions is voluminous. There is not a race on Earth that has not preserved at least one account which states as much. According to this evidence, Saturn occupied a central position in the north celestial regions.""It rotated, and rotated widely; but, other than that, it was immovable. It did not rise, it did not set. It merely became brighter and more glorious each night as the Sun set. This state of affairs seems to have lasted for ages. It is the one single dictum of the ancients from which all other beliefs are derived."Dwardu Cardona (1982)   Kunnen wij de symboliek van de oude beschavingen van over heel de wereld interpreteren als een optekening van wat zij zagen in de nachtelijke hemel ? Waren de planeten en hun onderlinge met geweld gepaard gaande plasma ontladingen hun goden ? Overal ter wereld zijn afbeeldingen gevonden met een treffende gelijkenis van een plasma ontlading.  Wanneer we het Plasma Universum betreden gaat de boel wel even aardig op zijn kop, een radicaal andere visie omtrent de krachten en bouwstenen die ons Universum behelzen. Zwarte gaten, donkere materie, zwaartekracht, bewustzijn, weten wij werkelijk hoe het allemaal werkt ?De symboliek en archetypen overal om ons heen krijgen plots een andere betekenis.Laten we de reis beginnen met een introductievideo van David Talbot en Wallace Thornhill.SYMBOLS OF AN ALIEN SKY  Bezoek voor zeer uitgebreide documentatie de website van Jno Cook;  http://saturniancosmology.org/index.php Prettige reis !  
het is niet wat het lijkt,... het is veel erger
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23142
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

za 28 aug 2010, 05:32

Sorry ik lees het nu pas. Ik kende dit vanuit een geschreven stuk van von Däniken meen ik me te herinneren...
1119 AD
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23142
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

za 28 aug 2010, 05:34

Afbeelding
1119 AD
Gebruikersavatar
rp801
QFF Gold Member
QFF Gold Member
Berichten: 209
Lid geworden op: zo 22 aug 2010, 16:42

za 28 aug 2010, 06:26

En nu maar hopen dat dodeca hier binnenkort zn kennis hierover komt delen :-*
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

zo 29 aug 2010, 04:09

Suns and Planets in Neolithic Rock Art

Copyright Ev Cochrane

If you have had your attention directed to the novelties of thought in your own lifetime, you will have observed that almost all really new ideas have a certain aspect of foolishness when they are first presented.

A. Whitehead In science, unlike religion, the great revelations lie in the future; the coming generations are the authorities; and the pupil is greater than the master, if he has the.GIFt to see things anew. All fruitful ideas have been conceived in the minds of non-conformists, for whom the known is still the unknown, and who often went back to begin where others passed by, sure of their way. The truth of today was the heresy of yesterday.

I. Velikovsky In Worlds in Collision, Immanuel Velikovsky claimed that the planets only recently settled upon their present orbits; that, in fact, great cataclysms have distinguished the recent history of the solar system. All agree that if true this thesis would have profound implications for various branches of natural science, particularly celestial mechanics and cosmology. Few agree, however, as to what constitutes valid evidence of the sort of events Velikovsky described.

Velikovsky himself, together with many of his supporters, suggested that Radvance claimsS regarding the state of various planets (such as the inordinate heat of Venus or radio-noises emanating from Jupiter, both anticipated by Velikovsky prior to their discovery) constituted prima facie evidence in support of the thesis. His critics, however, countered that correct predictions do not always constitute verification of the underlying thesis, while some even questioned the specificity and/or verification of Velikovsky's advanced claims.1 Thus the question remains: What sort of evidence apart from Venus suddenly leaving its current orbit and resuming a comet-like appearance would it take to convince conventional scholars that that planet recently moved upon a different orbitQthat the ancient skies were vastly different than the ones we see today?

It is apparently not enough that ancient peoples from around the world said as much. For example, a survey of ancient traditions reveals the following recurring motives: (1) in ancient times different RsunsS dominated the visible heavens; (2) the world was once plunged into darkness and brought to the brink of destruction when the sun was eclipsed as a result of being swallowed by a giant dragon; (3) on one occasion, it is said, the planet Venus took on a comet-like appearance.2 Such traditions, in the rare event that they are encountered and subjected to analysis, are notoriously difficult to interpret, and, in any case, are typically explained away as poetic metaphor having little basis in reality.

In deference to the currently prevailing opinion which would downplay the importance of ancient mythological traditions, we seek a more RobjectiveS source of evidence with which to explore the nature of the ancient cosmos. In addition to the ancient literary traditions, another record exists which offers evidence in support of recent changes in the solar system namely, prehistoric rock art. Ancient skywatchers from around the world have been drawing pictures of the celestial bodies since time immemorial, and the fact is that such pictures cannot be made to accord with the current arrangement of the solar system.

Prehistoric Petroglyphs of the Sun

The discovery in 1879 of spectacular paintings in the caves of Altamira (Spain) was initially met with disbelief and ridicule, so radical was the idea that Stone Age men could have created art of such sophistication and beauty. It was only upon the discovery of similar finds in France, Portugal and elsewhere in Europe that the scientific world became forced to accept the reality of Paleolithic rock art. Indeed, it has since been shown that rock art is abundant upon all inhabited continents and spans a period of time measured in millennia (the paintings of Altamira and Lascaux are typically dated to ca. 10-20,000 BCE).3

During the Paleolithic age, rock art was primarily devoted to the realistic representation of various forms of wildlife, the latter presumably objects of the hunt and rites of sympathetic magic.4 Especially common are paintings of horses and wisent, the great bison that once roamed the steppes of Europe, although mammoths, woolly Rhinoceroses, and other long extinct fauna also appear.

It was during the Neolithic age, apparently, that man began recording his perceptions of celestial phenomena through paintings and petroglyphs (incised images in rock). Not unlike fossilized bones, which provide an objective record against which to check the deductions drawn by paleontologists, rock art represents an objective record of mankind's enduring interest in the stars and offers a check upon conclusions deduced from comparative mythology.

Among the most common petroglyphs are those typically interpreted as images of the sun. Included here are simple images featuring a circular disc from which RraysS emanate in all directions (see Figure 1).5 Certainly this is how one might expect our forbears to have depicted the current solar orb.
Afbeelding

en nog veel meer:
http://www.bearfabrique.org/Catastrophi ... ckart.html
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

zo 29 aug 2010, 04:13

Masters of the Electric Universe

Afbeelding

"In the end The Universe will have its say."


http://www.joyfirepublishing.com/Joyfir ... iverse.php
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

wo 29 sep 2010, 22:49

Afbeelding
The Sun's changing magnetic field. Credit: SOHO - EIT Consortium, ESA, NASA.

Magnetic Disconnection
Sep 23, 2010

Problems with various theories could be resolved if mistaken identity were considered.

It has been proven in courts of law over the centuries that the worst possible witnesses are often those who were present at the scene of the crime. There are documented cases of people being held for crimes they didn't commit because one or more eyewitnesses swore under oath that they were the perpetrator. It becomes known only later when overwhelming evidence, such as DNA, proves that the convict could not have done what was claimed.

Often, the problem with mistaken identity is one of prejudice. Suspects are categorized by their racial profiles, their affiliations with radical groups, previous behavior, or association with those who are known lawbreakers. Lacking a confession from some other individual, law enforcement personnel are sometimes unable to prevent themselves from focussing on guilt by association, or circumstantial evidence. Assistant District Attorneys do not last long without convictions.

Similarly, professors at prestigious universities are compelled to follow "party lines" and to be prolific in their output of published articles. In order for funding to continue, the physics department must conduct experiments and turn out a steady stream of Ph.Ds for the scientific establishment in the military and the commercial sectors. Their experiments are usually expensive and take months to set up, so the funders expect results that will profit them in some way. LIGO and the Large Hadron Collider are two of the most notorious in a long list of experiments that are searching for phantoms.

When research groups are faced with a lack of evidence for their theories (the "confession"), they too resort to circumstantial investigations. One such case is magnetic reconnection—one of the best examples in modern physics of ad hoc theorizing when there are no witnesses.

According to a recent news release, one of the major obstacles with nuclear confinement fusion is that the plasma stream within the reactor suffers from magnetic reconnection events, creating instabilities that cause the reaction to stop. Since no one has the slightest idea how or why this hypothetical process works, how magnetic lines of force separate and recombine, no one can suggest a way to prevent it. It is a critical hinderance to further development in the thus far fruitless 60 year attempt at manufacturing a thermonuclear fusion power system.

This is not the first time that magnetic reconnection has been used as an excuse when observational data is missing. Today, it is a common "explanation" for Earth's aurorae. As the consensus view states, the magnetosphere surrounding Earth stretches and deforms like a teardrop because it is being bombarded by a powerful stream of charged particles from the Sun. As the field is pushed on the sunward side, it is stretched out on the other side of our planet, where the field lines are said to "unravel" and "flap like a flag waving in the wind."

According to the theory, when those magnetic field lines cross and "reconnect" through some unknown mechanism, they are supposed to detonate, releasing large quantities of heat, light and electrical energy. That power flows down the field lines into Earth's poles, where it causes the air molecules to glow with brilliant auroral colors. The potential energy that ignites the aurorae is said to be "stored" in the magnetic field lines.

Magnetic field lines cannot be the storehouse for magnetic energy because the field lines are no more real than the arrows that are used to describe an electric field, or the curved lines that trace out a sine wave. Those are character symbols, just as magnetic field lines are symbols that describe a magnetic field's schematic. A magnetic field acts as a continuum—it is not quantized into discrete bands. To say that magnetic field lines can cross, or flap, or break and reconnect is tantamount to saying that weather diagrams can produce rain.

Kristian Birkeland is not only spinning in his grave, he is doing cartwheels.

Strong magnetic disturbances are detected when a bright aurora is seen. It was in 1903 that Kristian Birkeland's observations led him to propose that electricity powered the aurorae, flowing parallel to the formation. Since electric current moves through a closed circuit, and since the currents and the glow seemed to be caused by processes in distant space, he theorized that the circuit's beginning came down from space at one end of the auroral arc and looped back out to space on the other end. In 1973, the U.S. Navy satellite Triad flew through this electrically charged layer. The onboard magnetometer found two electric currents in gigantic sheets, each carrying a million amperes or more, one descending on the auroral zone's morning side and one ascending on the evening side. Since Birkeland's research had predicted the currents that link Earth with space they were called Birkeland currents.

It is a case of mistaken identity for scientists to create a theoretical entity called "magnetic reconnection" when the forces and effects can be easily associated with solid evidentiary conclusions. Rather than electromagnetism acting in ways that are beyond the prevailing theories, why not use the evidence gathered by Birkeland more than a century ago as the explanation? It is the unfortunate character of modern research institutions that they cling to what has been pontificated from above and follow the well-worn path. That tendency goes so far as to ignore information, carefully documented by a dedicated scientist, in favor of fantastical speculations about what has never been seen.

Stephen Smith

Further reading:
Dr. Don Scott

Real Properties of Electromagnetic Fields and Plasma in the Cosmos
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, VOL. 35, NO. 4, AUGUST 2007
http://members.cox.net/dascott3/IEEE-Tr ... ug2007.pdf pdf alert!

bron:Thunderbolts.info http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2010/ ... ection.htm
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

wo 29 sep 2010, 22:52

Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

wo 29 sep 2010, 23:13

Electrical Discharge Theory

Charles Bruce (1902 - 1979)

"The surfaces of stars can be explained as lightning discharges which are observed in the atmosphere of the Earth"

In 1944, the late Charles Bruce wrote of many astronomical phenomena in a privately published monograph, A New Approach in Astrophysics and Cosmogony http://www.catastrophism.com/texts/bruce/astro.htm , a work which some of you will be familiar with. There he noted that many of the phenomena seen above the surfaces of stars can be explained as analogues, on a much grander scale, of lightning discharges which are observed in the atmosphere of the Earth. Using the notion that the things happening above the surfaces of stars are electrical, Bruce was able to explain many curious things that have puzzled astronomers about the very brightest stars, and also about those stars which vary in brightness over periods of years, weeks, or in some cases even hours. Where the conventionally-minded astronomers struggle with a model star that must blow itself up like a balloon and compress itself again, requiring its surface to move very great distances, often in short times, Bruce viewed the process of stellar variability as the propagation of a cosmic lightning bolt through the star's atmosphere. His was a far simpler answer. It required no internal readjustment of the whole star during the cycle: what was seen was an atmospheric effect.

Extending his idea of the existence of cosmic-scaled electrical discharges, Bruce noted that the nova eruption - popularly perceived as the explosion of a star - could also be explained using a cosmic atmospheric model. Seen conventionally, the nova eruption can mark the death of a star; to Bruce it was a discharge of great extent but with no fatal consequence for the star. Bruce's theorising, despite its congruence with observation, was not considered at all by astronomers, because he introduced the wrong word into the language: that word was electricity. There is no place in the cosmic realm for electricity, mainly because Sir Isaac Newton, your illustrious countryman, had convinced scientists that gravity alone was the active force ruling over cosmic motions. Since his day, we have been using gravity to do everything cosmic. In essence, Bruce's astronomical writings were not taken seriously in his lifetime; which is a shame, because they will form the basis of the astronomy of the next half-century for those who are alert enough to perceive the merit of his analysis.

Afbeelding

Bruce saw the processes of electrification in the cosmos as something that happened above a star rather that something that was fundamental to the star itself: I suppose he had no reason to question the notion that a star was the equivalent of a hydrogen bomb, although at the time he wrote hydrogen bombs had not been made. Nevertheless, in 1944 the notion existed that some nuclear process was the source of energy liberated deep within the body of stars. Some long-lived process was necessarily the generator within the Sun, because the geological requirements forbade a short-lived Sun. The Sun had to have radiated constantly over hundreds of millions of years, if not for thousands of millions of years, to allow the Earth to attain its present form after a long, slow metamorphosis of its original surface. Biological evolution required an equally long time to allow living things to be generated by chance from common chemical precursors, and then for life forms to emerge from the sea-bottom ooze as amoebas, some to aggregate and become fish, some to fly off as birds and others to crawl out on to the emerging land to become reptiles, and eventually for man to result. Thus it was the geologists and the biologists who told the astronomers that the Sun had to be very old. Old was fine, because gravitation is a very weak force which can only accomplish things over a very long time. Everything seemed to fit together. The Sun must be ancient and its energy source had to be constant. The Sun could not be viewed as a depletable resource, like North Sea oil, which will be here today and gone tomorrow. It must last "forever" and be imperturbable.

Whatever the reason, Bruce did not question the notion that the stars were thermonuclear-powered; he accepted the current astronomical opinion about how stars generated energy. His insight was to note that electrical processes were happening above the surfaces of many stars. He dealt only with the observational part of the astronomy: what goes on inside stars is a sort of fantasy which we all subscribe to because none of us have seen what happens inside stars. All we can observe is the radiation that emerges from the stars' surfaces, and what happens to the atmosphere transmitting that radiation.

Afbeelding

Bruce described exactly what happened in terms of the phenomenon. That surely is the mark of good science - watch and then explain. Today I fear too many astronomers bypass the details of the actual observations; working from predigested summaries of many observations and from prejudged theories (which must be true), they compute and speak of their results as if they were really things that have been observed. I still believe in the primacy of direct observation, and so I am a kind of dinosaur to many of my colleagues. Bruce's work didn't even draw attention when he predicted the quasi-stellar objects (or quasars) which have dominated astronomy in the decade from 1960 to 1970. He described very nicely the phenomena accompanying the galaxy-scaled electrical discharge which he claimed produced the observed quasar. When spacecraft were built and launched, they observed all the things he said were there; yet nobody pays attention to Bruce. It is a sadness that the man has died and hasn't received any recognition for his excellent writings in astronomy. He joins a host of other seers who shared the same fate.

From the article: Electric Stars in a Gravity-Less Electrified Cosmos, by Earl Milton, appearing in SIS Reviev Vol 5. No. 1 (1980/81) http://www.catastrophism.com/cdrom/pubs ... /index.htm , based on a talk given by Dr Milton at a meeting of the Society on "Aspects of Catastrophism", in April 1980, the original transcript of this talk was prepared by Birgit Liesching and Christoph Marx.

bron: http://www.catastrophism.com/texts/bruce/index.htm
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

wo 29 sep 2010, 23:20

An image of a sunspot was published Aug. 23, 2010 on the website of Ciel et l'Espace, as the photo of the day.
Afbeelding

http://spaceweather.com/swpod2010/27aug ... 4vrp3h5934
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

zo 10 okt 2010, 20:12

Magnetic Anomalies Shield The Moon

Scientists have discovered a new type of solar wind interaction with airless bodies in our solar system. Magnetized regions called magnetic anomalies, mostly on the far side of the Moon, were found to strongly deflect the solar wind, shielding the Moon's surface.

This will help understand the solar wind behavior near the lunar surface and how water may be generated in its upper layer. Observational evidence for these findings will be presented by Dr. Yoshifumi Futaana and Dr. Martin Wieser at the European Planetary Science Congress in Rome, on Friday 24th September.

Afbeelding
Spatial variation of the energetic neutral hydrogen flux over the magnetic anomaly close to the Gerasimovic crater. (a) High energy hydrogen flux with energy indicates a ~50% flux reduction inside the magnetic anomaly compared to the surrounding area. (b) Hydrogen flux with lower energy of 30-100 eV fills the magnetic anomaly. (c) The albedo (reflectivity) map of the Moon with the spacecraft trajectories (white lines).

Atmosphere-less bodies interact with the solar wind quite differently than the Earth. Their surfaces are exposed without any shielding by a dense atmosphere or magnetosphere. This causes them to be heavily weathered by meteoroids or the solar wind, forming a very rough and chaotic surface called regolith.

Previously, the solar wind was thought to be completely absorbed by the regolith. However, recent explorations of the Earth's moon by the Chang'E-1, Kaguya and Chandrayaan-1 spacecrafts have revealed that this interaction is not that simple.

A significant flux of high energy particles was found to originate from the lunar surface, most probably due to the solar wind directly reflected off the Moon's regolith.

"These results may change dramatically the way we understood the solar wind-regolith interaction so far," says Dr. Futaana of the Swedish Institute of Space Physics.

"Since the solar wind is one potential source of water on the Moon, we need to make better models of the lunar hydrogen circulation in order to understand how water molecules form in its upper layers. Also, it will be possible to remotely investigate the solar wind-surface interaction on other airless bodies, such as Mercury or the Martian moon Phobos, by imaging the energetic hydrogen atoms that are reflected back to space when the solar wind hits their surface," he adds.

The current investigation was carried out with the Sub-keV Atom Reflecting Analyzer instrument which was developed in a collaboration between Sweden, India, Switzerland and Japan and flown onboard the Indian Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft.

Scientists have mapped for the first time the energetic hydrogen atoms coming from the Moon, and found that up to one fifth of the solar wind protons reaching the lunar surface are reflected back to space.

This may be a general feature of the atmosphere-less bodies, such as Mercury, meteorites and several moons of the giant planets.

"In fact, during the close encounter of the European Mars Express spacecraft with Phobos in 2008, we detected signatures of reflected solar wind protons also from the surface of the Martian moon Phobos," says Dr. Futaana.

However, when Chandrayaan-1 flew over a magnetic anomaly on the lunar surface, the scientists detected significantly less reflected hydrogen atoms, meaning that the solar wind had not reached the lunar surface. In fact, the solar wind was found to be strongly deflected by an aggregation of magnetic anomalies in the southern hemisphere of the lunar far side.

"We detected a strong flux of deflected solar wind protons. This clearly indicates that magnetic anomalies can shield the lunar surface from the incoming solar wind, in the same way as the magnetospheres of several planets in our solar system," says Dr. Futaana.

"It all depends on how strong the solar wind 'blows'. When the solar wind pressure is low, this 'mini-magnetosphere' expands, causing stronger shielding," adds Dr. Wieser, also of the Swedish Institute of Space Physics.

by Staff Writers Rome, Italy (SPX) Sep 27, 2010

http://www.moondaily.com/reports/Magnet ... n_999.html
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 23142
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

zo 10 okt 2010, 20:20

Tja, de zon was overigens vandaag bijzonder krachtig! Hoe gek het ook mag klinken, ik verwacht dat e zon ons nog we;l wat problemen op gaat leveren!

:sun:

Stel je nu eens voor dat de zon ineens héél extreem krachtig zou worden en daardoor onze aarde opeens niet meer of veel minder geschikt is (gedurende een paar jaar)om voedsel (lees:gewassen) te verbouwen, dan krijg je dus hongersnood, die vervolgens in een oorlog gaat ontluiken. En tja dat klinkt allemaal heel DOOMY maar ik dacht er laatst eens over na en dacht toen dat die stijgende activiteit dan de zon best eens door zou kunnen blijven groeien. Zijn we daar wel goed op voorbereid? Just a thought...

@ Combi: Valt het je op dat deze waarnemingen veelal weer op de "far" dus dark-side of the moon worden waargenomen?
1119 AD
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

zo 10 okt 2010, 20:46

The Sahara Desert

Afbeelding
The African Sahara Desert. Composite satellite image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Afric ... raphic.jpg in orthographic projection: Credit: NASA.

Apr 08, 2010
An extraterrestrial sand scar?


The light areas in the image above show the wide swath of desert area that extends across Africa, the Middle East, and the entire Asian continent. It encompasses many deserts including the Sahara.

The Sahara http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahara is the world's largest hot desert. At over 9,000,000 square kilometres (3,500,000 square miles), it covers most of Northern Africa, making it almost as large as the United States or the continent of Europe. The desert stretches from the Red Sea, including parts of the Mediterranean coasts, to the outskirts of the Atlantic Ocean. Some of the sand dunes can reach 180 meters (600 ft.) in height. Mixed in with the oceanic sands there are large rock formations, boulders, stones and pebbles. Some have compared areas of the Sahara to the surface of Mars.

The sands of the Sahara hold many secrets. It wasn’t always a vast desolate ocean of sand; around 5,000 years ago it was a very different terrain. It was a sub-tropical paradise where deer, hippos and elephants were hunted and giraffes and rhinoceros roamed the area. With a plentiful supply of food, thousands of hunter-gatherers flocked to live in this lush savannah.

These facts are evident from the discovery of hundreds of human graves and numerous rock paintings http://www.thenational.ae/ , depicting people hunting and even swimming. Furthermore, radar images taken by the NASA space shuttle show that beneath the sand are networks of rivers afsafOasis_SAR_comparison.jpg" class="postlink">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Safsa ... arison.jpg , once spanning the entire Sahara.

Afbeelding

North Africa was once alive with people! What happened to this lush green world?

It was initially believed the Sahara died out abruptly about 5,000 years ago. However, recent studies have supposedly shown this to be incorrect. Conventional scientists believe the process took about three millennia as reported by Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL0833018820080508 in May 2008.

“The once-green Sahara turned to desert over thousands of years rather than in an abrupt shift as previously believed, according to a study on Thursday that may help understanding of future climate changes. The study of ancient pollen, spores and aquatic organisms in sediments in Lake Yoa in northern Chad showed the region gradually shifted from savannah 6,000 years ago towards the arid conditions that took over about 2,700 years ago. The findings, about one of the biggest environmental shifts of the past 10,000 years, challenge past belief based on evidence in marine sediments that a far quicker change created the world's biggest hot desert.”

Sand

Sand is the result of finely weathered and eroded rock. It is believed it takes tens of thousands, if not millions of years for exposed rock to weather into sand. The longer this erosion takes place, the finer the grains. The sand in the Sahara is some of the oldest on the planet; it is believed to have existed for seven million years. Some of the sand dunes are rich in iron ore. The impurities stain the quartz particles, which accounts for their yellow colour.

Where did the Sahara sand come from? It did not exist 6,000 years ago. Experts are proposing that vast oceans of sand formed in less than 3,300 years. This is impossible because Saharan sand is some of the oldest on the planet. Putting this into context means that an area the size of the US has been covered in a vast sea of sand in what has to be the blink of an eye in geological terms. This makes no sense because the time frame for the formation of the sand does not allow it according to consensus theories. If the adjoining deserts swathing out across the Middle East and Asia are also considered, this equates to an area twice the size of the US. Where did all this sand come from?

Is it possible the earth is covered with debris from recent cosmic catastrophe? Could debris such as large boulders, rocks, stones, pebbles, dust and sand which are believed to be indigenous to Earth actually be extraterrestrial in origin?

Wall Thornhill speaking on "Coast to Coast" November 26, 2007:

“When you have an highly charged object like a comet coming towards the earth, before it strikes the earth there will be an electrical discharge between the two bodies and that discharge will usually be of sufficient magnitude to destroy the incoming object - so you end up with a shower of sand and stuff like that."

"The famous Chicago fires http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chicago_Fire where that whole area of the US was lit by strange fires and falls of sand and such like. And this occurred at the time of the disappearance of Biela's comet."

Countless tons of rocks bombarded Earth’s atmosphere, fragmenting and breaking up into fine grains of sand. As it fell to Earth it covered vast areas of once-lush, green fertile land, turning it into the barren deserts we see today.

This sand forms a gigantic scar across the landscape which suggests great swarms of debris were hurled at the Earth, and the enormous quantities of sand demonstrates the extent of this bombardment.

Contributed by Gary Gilligan
http://gks.uk.com/

bron:Thunderbolts

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2010/ ... sahara.htm
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

zo 10 okt 2010, 20:55

[quote name="Baphomet"]Tja, de zon was overigens vandaag bijzonder krachtig! Hoe gek het ook mag klinken, ik verwacht dat e zon ons nog we;l wat problemen op gaat leveren!

:sun:

Stel je nu eens voor dat de zon ineens héél extreem krachtig zou worden en daardoor onze aarde opeens niet meer of veel minder geschikt is (gedurende een paar jaar)om voedsel (lees:gewassen) te verbouwen, dan krijg je dus hongersnood, die vervolgens in een oorlog gaat ontluiken. En tja dat klinkt allemaal heel DOOMY maar ik dacht er laatst eens over na en dacht toen dat die stijgende activiteit dan de zon best eens door zou kunnen blijven groeien. Zijn we daar wel goed op voorbereid? Just a thought...

@ Combi: Valt het je op dat deze waarnemingen veelal weer op de "far" dus dark-side of the moon worden waargenomen?[/quote]

ja, ik zou graag een rondje mee willen vliegen met die ufo van niburu ;-) om daar is te kijken.
Gebruikersavatar
combi
Administrator
Administrator
Berichten: 15954
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

zo 17 okt 2010, 01:27

Afbeelding
Mimas is sharply outlined against the giant planet Saturn. Credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute

Casualty of War
Oct 14, 2010

Saturn's moons are enigmatic, with features that are difficult to explain using conventional theories.


Mimas Is a tiny world, only 397 kilometers in diameter. It compares in size to another of its sisters, Enceladus, and to one of Neptune's moons, Proteus. Mimas looks like the “Death Star” space station seen in a popular movie.

Afbeelding
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA06257.jpg

The giant crater that dominates one of its hemispheres is about one-eighth the diameter of the entire moon. A crater of similar scale would cover almost half of Earth's Pacific basin. Why such an enormous shock did not disrupt the moon's material structure is a mystery that continues to baffle planetary scientists.

Herschel crater, named for Sir William Herschel who discovered Mimas in 1789, is 130 kilometers wide with a towering central peak. Such craters are theorized to form from asteroid impacts. However, there is little debris within the crater and not many boulders or other fragments surround it.

Researchers think that one reason for the lack of debris is that Mimas has little gravitational attraction, so the blast remnants did not remain nearby. It sounds like a plausible explanation, except that the craters on large planets like Earth and Mars—some many hundreds of kilometers wide—also demonstrate little eruptive fallback, their floors and sidewalls are swept clean, though some glassified breccia is often incorporated into them.

The greatest puzzle of all is the hexagonal shape of Herschel crater.

Afbeelding
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/4355 ... 2-full.jpg

How can an asteroid explosion cause a hexagonal crater? No high velocity gun experiments have demonstrated a polygonal crater after an explosive event. Impact events do not result in such formations. Instead, they are chaotic and leave behind circular depressions with conical bottoms.

Another recent discovery http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/image ... ageId=3919 on Mimas is the peculiar temperature distribution. Mimas is an extremely cold place. Infrared measurements of its surface by the Cassini spacecraft reveal it to range from -146 Celsius to -160 Celsius. It is the strange pattern of cold that is confusing NASA mission team members.

It was expected that Mimas would be the warmest in the area where the Sun's energy shines straight down. However, the infrared map generated by Cassini indicates http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/figure ... 7_fig1.tif that the warmest temperature is along the western limb.

Other false-color images http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA06257.jpg seem to suggest that the temperature differences correspond to surface composition, but no one is sure why. It could be that the ice grains vary in size, causing them to change the way they reflect light.

In previous Picture of the Day articles
Afbeelding
Popigai Crater. Credit: Ronald W. Hayes Landsat/PASSC
http://thunderbolts.info/tpod/2008/arch ... crater.htm,

we have attempted to provide evidence for plasma discharges on Saturn's moons. Lightning bolts, diffuse glow-mode clouds of energetic particles, and rotating Birkeland currents have been suggested as causative agents for the bizarre conditions found there.

It could be that Mimas has collected a coating of some compounds that were eroded from the other moons in the Saturnian system, especially Phoebe. It was argued in previous Picture of the Day articles that the splotches of dark red and sooty black coloring the faces of Rhea, Tethys, Iapetus, and Mimas are made of ultra fine dust electrically etched from Phoebe.

Mimas might have once been caught in the grip of an interplanetary particle beam that excavated Herschel crater and the other geological features incised on its face. Due to the plasma instabilities in the discharge, a hexagon was cut deeply into its crust. When the electrical energy was withdrawn, Herschel crater remained, a “fossilized” geometric shape permanently burned in.

The electric currents that cut the craters and rilles on Mimas most likely left evidence of their passages in other ways. The anomalous temperature measurement that cannot be attributed to the Sun's influence is probably one sign of those past catastrophes. It may be that the unusual V-shaped pattern in the false color images from Cassini is a warmer layer of dust and ice that was excavated from Herschel crater and ionically deposited "downwind" by a high-energy plasma discharge in the recent past.

Stephen Smith

bron: http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2010/ ... sualty.htm
Plaats reactie

Terug naar “Natuur”